Thursby v. Peacock

52 So. 619, 152 So. 619, 113 Fla. 837
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 27, 1934·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thursby v. Peacock, 52 So. 619, 152 So. 619, 113 Fla. 837 (Fla. 1934).

52 So. 619 (Thursby v. Peacock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.