Thurn v. Workforce Safety and Insurance
This text of 2006 ND 202 (Thurn v. Workforce Safety and Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 10/17/06 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2006 ND 200
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Grady Jackson, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20060034
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Burt L. Riskedahl, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Susan Schmidt, 400 East Broadway Avenue, Suite 27, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for defendant and appellant; on brief.
Lloyd Clayton Suhr, Assistant State’s Attorney, Burleigh County Courthouse, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for plaintiff and appellee; on brief.
State v. Jackson
[¶1] Grady Jackson appeals from a criminal judgment after a district court found him guilty of driving under suspension. Jackson argues law enforcement had no reasonable and articulable suspicion to justify a traffic stop and insufficient evidence supported his conviction.
[¶2] We hold the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence that was obtained after a law enforcement officer observed Jackson’s erratic driving, prompting a reasonable stop. Adequate evidence existed to support the conviction. We therefore affirm the judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4).
[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V. Sandstrom
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2006 ND 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thurn-v-workforce-safety-and-insurance-nd-2006.