Thurmond v. Groves & Co.

55 S.E. 915, 126 Ga. 779, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 540
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 14, 1906·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Bumpkin, J.

1. This ease is controlled in principle by that of Dodson Printers’ Supply Co. v. Harris, 114 Ga. 966 (2), 968-9. While generally the rules of practice in the superior court are made applicable to the city court of Washington, except as in the act establishing that court provided, yet as to cases returnable to the monthly term of such, court the practice in the superior court in regard to appearance days, the allowance of thirty days in which to open defaults, and the discretionary power to do so thereafter, is not applicable. The first term is the trial term; and the presiding judge is not vested with discretion to open a default and allow a plea to be filed at a later term. Acts 1905, p. 404, §§ 17, 18; Morgan v. Prior, 110 Ga. 791.

2. If there were any duty on the part of the judge to mark the case in default under this act, in the absence of anything appearing to the contrary, the presumption would be that he did so. Norman v. Great Western Tailoring Co., 121 Ga. 813.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thurmond v. Groves & Co., 55 S.E. 915, 126 Ga. 779, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 540 (Ga. 1906).

55 S.E. 915 (Thurmond v. Groves & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cobb v. Burgamy
147 S.E. 921 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Strother v. Harper
136 S.E. 828 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Daniel v. Nixon & Wright
93 S.E. 1013 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Jenkins v. Whittier Mills Co.
93 S.E. 530 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Buford v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.
93 S.E. 318 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Riverdale Pecan Co. v. Cutter
85 S.E. 929 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Florida Central Railroad v. Luke
75 S.E. 270 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)
Hunter v. Hinman
66 S.E. 1039 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)
Heitmann v. Commercial Bank
65 S.E. 590 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)