Thurmond Dlanzo Washington v. State
This text of Thurmond Dlanzo Washington v. State (Thurmond Dlanzo Washington v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Thurmond Dlanzo Washington, appellant, has filed with this Court a motion to dismiss his appeal. The motion is signed by Washington and by his counsel in compliance with Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. As authorized by Rule 42.2, we grant the motion. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
Josh R. Morriss, III
Chief Justice
Date Submitted: March 12, 2007
Date Decided: March 13, 2007
Do Not Publish
t-family: Times New Roman">
William House, appellant, filed his notice of appeal September 13, 2007. House has not filed a docketing statement with this Court, see Tex. R. App. P. 32, nor has he paid a filing fee or made any claim of indigency. There is nothing in the record to indicate House has made efforts to have either the clerk's record or reporter's record filed with this Court, and he has not filed a brief. On October 30, 2007, we contacted House by letter, giving him an opportunity to cure the various defects, and warning him that, if we did not receive an adequate response within ten days, this appeal would be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).
We have received no communication from House. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.
Jack Carter
Justice
Date Submitted: November 27, 2007
Date Decided: November 28, 2007
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Thurmond Dlanzo Washington v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thurmond-dlanzo-washington-v-state-texapp-2007.