Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Thurman v. State

Thurman v. State

957 So. 2d 89, 2007 WL 1372904
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 11, 2007
Docket5D06-4480
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 957 So. 2d 89 (Thurman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thurman v. State, 957 So. 2d 89, 2007 WL 1372904 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

957 So.2d 89 (2007)

Edward THURMAN, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 5D06-4480.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

May 11, 2007.
Rehearing Denied June 7, 2007.

Edward Thurman, Sanderson, pro se.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeffrey R. Casey, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We deem the instant petition for writ of certiorari to be a notice of appeal and, finding no error, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

PALMER, TORPY and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wamsley v. Wamsley
957 So. 2d 89 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
957 So. 2d 89, 2007 WL 1372904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thurman-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.