Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Thurman v. State

Thurman v. State

957 So. 2d 89, 2007 WL 1372904
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 11, 2007·No. 5D06-4480·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

957 So.2d 89 (2007)

Edward THURMAN, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 5D06-4480.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

May 11, 2007.
Rehearing Denied June 7, 2007.

Edward Thurman, Sanderson, pro se.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeffrey R. Casey, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We deem the instant petition for writ of certiorari to be a notice of appeal and, finding no error, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

PALMER, TORPY and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thurman v. State, 957 So. 2d 89, 2007 WL 1372904 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

957 So. 2d 89 (Thurman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wamsley v. Wamsley
957 So. 2d 89 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)