Thurman v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Thurman v. Smith

94 S.E. 278, 21 Ga. App. 317, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 574

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thurman v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 16 Ga. App. 523 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 16, 1917·No. 8616·Published

Opinion

Jenkins, J.

Under the ruling made in Thurman v. Avera, 20 Ga. App. 802 (93 S. E. 495), the order passed by the trial judge denying the relief prayed against the defendant in the trover suit, on account of his failure to give the bond previously required by the court in the discharge proceedings instituted by the defendant, was not erroneous.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, 0. J., and Luhe, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jenkins, J.

Under the ruling made in Thurman v. Avera, 20 Ga. App. 802 (93 S. E. 495), the order passed by the trial judge denying the relief prayed against the defendant in the trover suit, on account of his failure to give the bond previously required by the court in the discharge proceedings instituted by the defendant, was not erroneous.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, 0. J., and Luhe, J., concur.

Thurman v. Smith, 94 S.E. 278, 21 Ga. App. 317, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 574 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

94 S.E. 278 (Thurman v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related