Thurman v. Childers
This text of 1947 OK 38 (Thurman v. Childers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A writ of mandamus is sought in this original action to compel the State Auditor to allow salary claims for services rendered as extra help from July 1 to July 25, 1945, in the office of the State Examiner and Inspector. Payment of the claims from the Governor’s Emergency and Contingency Fund was denied in Wells v. Childers, 196 Okla. 355, 165 P. 2d 371. Payment is now sought from funds appropriated by S. B. 181, 1945 S. L. 465.
Prior to the employment, the Attorney General advised that in the absence, of an emergency clause, S. B. 181 would not become effective until July 26, 1945, and therefore the funds appropriated would not be subject to obligation prior' to that time.
While the act upon its effective date made an appropriation for the purpose, for the entire fiscal year, the act, prior, to its effective date, did not authorize the employment or the creation of any debt or obligation against the funds subsequently available. Section 23, art. 10, Const. There is no indication contained in the act, supra, of a retroactive effect to the implied authority for employment, and as no other authority is relied upon, and a request for the audit as contemplated by S. B. 233, Title 64, ch. 1, p. 247, S. L. 1945, is not shown to exist until after July 30, 1945, the writ, under authority of Board of Com’rs of Carter County v. Worten, 128 Okla. 104, 261 P. 553, must be denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1947 OK 38, 177 P.2d 108, 198 Okla. 205, 1947 Okla. LEXIS 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thurman-v-childers-okla-1947.