Thurber v. Thurber

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Thurber v. Thurber

2 R.I. Dec. 77

CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island

DecidedJanuary 20, 1926

DocketDiv.No.19440

StatusPublished

This text of 2 R.I. Dec. 77 (Thurber v. Thurber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thurber v. Thurber, 2 R.I. Dec. 77 (R.I. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

TANNER, P. J.

This case is heard upon petition of the wife for absolute divorce from her husband on the ground of extreme cruelty.

The continuous disagreeable conduct and -profane and Vulgar language [78]*78of the respondent, affecting the health of the petitioner, would be sufficient to constitute cruelty under the statute.

For Petitioner: Wilson, Churchill ,& Curtis. For Respondent: Quinn, Keman & ..Quinn.

We feel, however, that the continued association of the petitioner with Mr. Pierce, husband of another woman, which association still continues since the bringing- of the petition for divorce, even though it may have been as innocent as the parties to such association claim, was nevertheless of such character as to subject the parties to just suspicion and .as to be such an improper association .as to deprive the petitioner of ner right to divorce in this case.

The petition is therefore denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TANNER, P. J.

This case is heard upon petition of the wife for absolute divorce from her husband on the ground of extreme cruelty.

The continuous disagreeable conduct and -profane and Vulgar language [78]*78of the respondent, affecting the health of the petitioner, would be sufficient to constitute cruelty under the statute.

For Petitioner: Wilson, Churchill ,& Curtis. For Respondent: Quinn, Keman & ..Quinn.

We feel, however, that the continued association of the petitioner with Mr. Pierce, husband of another woman, which association still continues since the bringing- of the petition for divorce, even though it may have been as innocent as the parties to such association claim, was nevertheless of such character as to subject the parties to just suspicion and .as to be such an improper association .as to deprive the petitioner of ner right to divorce in this case.

The petition is therefore denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 R.I. Dec. 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thurber-v-thurber-risuperct-1926.