Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Thurber v. Thurber

Thurber v. Thurber

281 A.D.2d 410, 721 N.Y.S.2d 288, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2113
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 5, 2001·Published

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for [411] unjust enrichment, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.), dated November 12, 1999, which, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint. The appellant failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the respondent’s retention of certain marital property constituted unjust enrichment (see, Sharp v Kosmalski, 40 NY2d 119).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit (see, Matter of Gould v Board of Educ., 81 NY2d 446; Marine Midland Bank-Southern v Thurlow, 53 NY2d 381; Stage Club Corp. v West Realty Co., 212 AD2d 458; Katz v American Tech. Indus., 96 AD2d 932). Friedmann, J. P., Florio, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thurber v. Thurber, 281 A.D.2d 410, 721 N.Y.S.2d 288, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2113 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

281 A.D.2d 410 (Thurber v. Thurber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sharp v. Kosmalski
351 N.E.2d 721 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
Marine Midland Bank-Southern v. Thurlow
425 N.E.2d 805 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
Gould v. Board of Education
616 N.E.2d 142 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
Katz v. American Technical Industries, Inc.
96 A.D.2d 932 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Stage Club Corp. v. West Realty Co.
212 A.D.2d 458 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)