Thurairajah v. Cross

District Court, W.D. Arkansas·Decided July 17, 2018·No. 2:16-cv-02123·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION

ERIC ROSHAUN THURAIRAJAH PLAINTIFF

v. No. 2:16-CV-02123

BILL HOLLENBECK, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff for the County of Sebastian; and TROOPER LAGARIAN CROSS, individually and in his official capacity as a state trooper with and for the State of Arkansas DEFENDANTS

ORDER

On October 6, 2017, the Court entered an opinion and order denying qualified immunity and summary judgment to Defendant Cross. Thereafter, Defendant Hollenbeck filed a motion to dismiss, and then Defendant Cross filed a notice of appeal, divesting this Court of jurisdiction. Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56, 58 (1982). Where an interlocutory appeal has been taken on an order denying summary judgment on qualified immunity, “the district court should then stay its hand . . . and the district court should not act further.” Johnson v. Hay, 931 F.2d 456, 459 n.2 (8th Cir. 1991). This matter should be stayed and Defendant Hollenbeck’s motion should not remain pending before the Court. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this matter is STAYED pending resolution of the appellate process and Defendant Hollenbeck’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 40) is TERMINATED, with leave to refile when jurisdiction returns to this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of July, 2018. /s/P. K. Holmes, III P.K. HOLMES, III CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thurairajah v. Cross, (W.D. Ark. 2018).

Thurairajah v. Cross (Thurairajah v. Cross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.
459 U.S. 56 (Supreme Court, 1982)
Earsel L. Johnson v. Bill Hay
931 F.2d 456 (Eighth Circuit, 1991)