Thundercloud v. Warden, Ross Correctional Institution
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
MICHAEL S. THUNDERCLOUD, CASE NO. 2:20-CV-4747 Petitioner, JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson v.
WARDEN, ROSS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,
Respondent.
ORDER
On March 16, 2021, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the petition or a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be dismissed. Although the parties were advised of the right to file objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 11) is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED. Petitioner has waived the right to appeal by failing to file objections. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). The Court therefore DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. 4/13/2021 EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thundercloud v. Warden, Ross Correctional Institution (Thundercloud v. Warden, Ross Correctional Institution) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.