Thum v. Isermann
32 Misc. 708, 65 N.Y.S. 1147
This text of 32 Misc. 708 (Thum v. Isermann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Thum v. Isermann, 32 Misc. 708, 65 N.Y.S. 1147 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).
Opinion
An answer was requisite. Order affirmed, with .ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
32 Misc. 708, 65 N.Y.S. 1147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thum-v-isermann-nyappterm-1900.