Thum v. Isermann

32 Misc. 708, 65 N.Y.S. 1147

This text of 32 Misc. 708 (Thum v. Isermann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thum v. Isermann, 32 Misc. 708, 65 N.Y.S. 1147 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Opinion

Per Ouriam.

An answer was requisite. Order affirmed, with .ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 Misc. 708, 65 N.Y.S. 1147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thum-v-isermann-nyappterm-1900.