Thum v. Iserman

City of New York Municipal Court

Thum v. Iserman

54 N.Y.S. 559, 25 Misc. 327

DecidedNovember 18, 1898

StatusPublished

This text of 54 N.Y.S. 559 (Thum v. Iserman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thum v. Iserman, 54 N.Y.S. 559, 25 Misc. 327 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The amended complaint, which was accepted by the defendant and was verified, required from the defendant an amended answer, winch should have been verified. The answer served was not verified. Therefore the judgment as entered was correct practice.

The defendant’s default, however, will be vacated, providing he will within six days comply with the terms imposed by the order appealed from; and if he refuses to do so, then the motion to vacate judgment is hereby denied, and the order appealed from affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The amended complaint, which was accepted by the defendant and was verified, required from the defendant an amended answer, winch should have been verified. The answer served was not verified. Therefore the judgment as entered was correct practice.

The defendant’s default, however, will be vacated, providing he will within six days comply with the terms imposed by the order appealed from; and if he refuses to do so, then the motion to vacate judgment is hereby denied, and the order appealed from affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 N.Y.S. 559, 25 Misc. 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thum-v-iserman-nynyccityct-1898.