Thuan Dinh Tran v. State of Iowa

CourtCourt of Appeals of Iowa
DecidedJune 29, 2022
Docket21-1689
StatusPublished

This text of Thuan Dinh Tran v. State of Iowa (Thuan Dinh Tran v. State of Iowa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thuan Dinh Tran v. State of Iowa, (iowactapp 2022).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 21-1689 Filed June 29, 2022

THUAN DINH TRAN, Applicant-Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF IOWA, Respondent-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Mark R. Lawson,

Judge.

Thuan Tran appeals the dismissal of his application for postconviction relief.

AFFIRMED.

Elizabeth K. Elsten, Spirit Lake, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Genevieve Reinkoester, Assistant

Attorney General, for appellee State.

Considered by May, P.J., and Greer and Chicchelly, JJ. 2

MAY, Presiding Judge.

Thuan Tran was convicted of second-degree sexual abuse. He appealed

his conviction, but this court affirmed. See generally State v. Tran, No. 17-0533,

2018 WL 739320 (Iowa Ct. App. Feb. 7, 2018). Procedendo issued on March 13,

2018. Then Tran filed an application for postconviction relief (PCR) on July 23,

2021. The State moved to dismiss Tran’s application because it wasn’t filed within

the three-year period allowed by Iowa Code section 822.3 (2021). The PCR court

granted the motion and dismissed Tran’s application. Tran appeals.

On appeal, Tran asks us to adopt equitable tolling as a means around

section 822.3.1 But “this court has frequently held that equitable tolling does not

apply to section 822.3.” See Smith v. State, No. 19-0384, 2020 WL 110398, at *1

& n.2 (Iowa Ct. App. Jan. 9, 2020) (collecting cases). And we see no reason to

choose a different path today.

Because Tran’s application was untimely, the PCR court was right to

dismiss it. We affirm without further opinion. See Iowa Ct. R. 21.26(1)(d), (e).

1 Our review is for legal error. Nguyen v. State, 829 N.W.2d 183, 186 (Iowa 2013).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Phuoc Thanh Nguyen v. State of Iowa
829 N.W.2d 183 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Thuan Dinh Tran v. State of Iowa, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thuan-dinh-tran-v-state-of-iowa-iowactapp-2022.