Thrower v. Sparrow

346 Or. App. 473
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided January 7, 2026·No. A184592·Unpublished

Opinion

No. 13 January 7, 2026 473

This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

Rodney THROWER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kelly SPARROW and the City of Eugene, an Oregon municipal corporation, Defendants, and PROGRESSIVE UNIVERSAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. Lane County Circuit Court 23CV20951; A184592

Debra E. Velure, Judge. Argued and submitted December 17, 2025. Rachel M. Jennings argued the cause for appellant. On the briefs was Travis Eiva. Katie Buxman argued the cause for respondent. Also on the brief was Alexander J. Brunino and Maloney Lauersdorf Reiner, PC. Before Aoyagi, Presiding Judge, Egan, Judge, and Pagán, Judge. AOYAGI, P. J. Affirmed. Shepherd v. Progressive Classic Ins. Co., 333 Or App 39, 551 P3d 967, rev allowed, 373 Or 121 (2024); North Pacific Ins. Co. v. Anderson, 110 Or App 269, 821 P2d 444 (1991).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thrower v. Sparrow, 346 Or. App. 473 (Or. Ct. App. 2026).

346 Or. App. 473 (Thrower v. Sparrow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

North Pacific Insurance v. Anderson
821 P.2d 444 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1991)
Sheppard v. Progressive Classic Ins. Co.
551 P.3d 967 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2024)