Thrower v. Sparrow
This text of 346 Or. App. 473 (Thrower v. Sparrow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No. 13 January 7, 2026 473
This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
Rodney THROWER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kelly SPARROW and the City of Eugene, an Oregon municipal corporation, Defendants, and PROGRESSIVE UNIVERSAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. Lane County Circuit Court 23CV20951; A184592
Debra E. Velure, Judge. Argued and submitted December 17, 2025. Rachel M. Jennings argued the cause for appellant. On the briefs was Travis Eiva. Katie Buxman argued the cause for respondent. Also on the brief were Alexander J. Brunino and Maloney Lauersdorf Reiner, PC. Before Aoyagi, Presiding Judge, Egan, Judge, and Pagán, Judge. AOYAGI, P. J. Affirmed. Shepherd v. Progressive Classic Ins. Co., 333 Or App 39, 551 P3d 967, rev allowed, 373 Or 121 (2024); North Pacific Ins. Co. v. Anderson, 110 Or App 269, 821 P2d 444 (1991).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
346 Or. App. 473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thrower-v-sparrow-orctapp-2026.