Thrower v. Lyons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Thrower v. Lyons

273 A.D.2d 225, 709 N.Y.S.2d 842, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6286

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 5, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 273 A.D.2d 225 (Thrower v. Lyons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thrower v. Lyons, 273 A.D.2d 225, 709 N.Y.S.2d 842, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6286 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LaTorella, J.), dated August 31, 1998, which granted the defendants’ respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the respondent Nathan C. Lyons.

The defendants submitted proof in admissible form which established that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), and the plaintiff failed to come forward with sufficient admissible evidence to demonstrate the existence of a triable issue of fact (see, Williams v Ciaramella, 250 AD2d 763; Miller v Donohue, 250 AD2d 825; Grossman v Wright, 268 AD2d 79). Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, S. Miller, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LaTorella, J.), dated August 31, 1998, which granted the defendants’ respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the respondent Nathan C. Lyons.

The defendants submitted proof in admissible form which established that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), and the plaintiff failed to come forward with sufficient admissible evidence to demonstrate the existence of a triable issue of fact (see, Williams v Ciaramella, 250 AD2d 763; Miller v Donohue, 250 AD2d 825; Grossman v Wright, 268 AD2d 79). Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, S. Miller, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 A.D.2d 225, 709 N.Y.S.2d 842, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thrower-v-lyons-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack