Thrower v. Brandon

89 Ala. 406
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 15, 1889·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

MoCLELLAN, J.

There is nothing in the objection relied on to operate a reversal of the judgment in this case. In determining whether service of summons has been perfected twenty days previous to the return term, the first day of the term is the last day of the period limited, and if by including this day, as required by section 1! of the Code, twenty days have elapsed after the day of service, the case stands for trial at that term. Such has been, we believe, the universal understanding and practice of the bar and nisi prius courts, and is, we do not doubt, the sound construction of section 2731 of the Code. — Garner & Neville v. Johnson, 22 Ala. 494, 501.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thrower v. Brandon, 89 Ala. 406 (Ala. 1889).

89 Ala. 406 (Thrower v. Brandon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Register
60 So. 2d 41 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1952)
Walton v. City of Mobile
167 So. 247 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1936)
Richter v. State
47 So. 163 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1908)
Foster v. State ex rel. Stanford
43 So. 179 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1907)