Thropp v. Richardson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Thropp v. Richardson

19 A. 218, 132 Pa. 399, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 828

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 17, 1890

DocketNo. 149

StatusPublished

This text of 19 A. 218 (Thropp v. Richardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thropp v. Richardson, 19 A. 218, 132 Pa. 399, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 828 (Pa. 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The finding of the jury has taken the heart out of the appellant’s ease. They found specially “that the defendant did [401]*401know of said furnishing of the stone; that the defendant did consent to said furnishing of said stone to said firm.” It was attempted to meet this by an argument to show that the finding was without evidence to support it. But the ingenious and able argument of the learned counsel for the appellant has failed to convince us upon this point. Without going into tedious detail, we think there was evidence amply sufficient to sustain the verdict. The assignments of error are voluminous, and need not be considered separately. None of them is sustained.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The finding of the jury has taken the heart out of the appellant’s ease. They found specially “that the defendant did [401]*401know of said furnishing of the stone; that the defendant did consent to said furnishing of said stone to said firm.” It was attempted to meet this by an argument to show that the finding was without evidence to support it. But the ingenious and able argument of the learned counsel for the appellant has failed to convince us upon this point. Without going into tedious detail, we think there was evidence amply sufficient to sustain the verdict. The assignments of error are voluminous, and need not be considered separately. None of them is sustained.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A. 218, 132 Pa. 399, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thropp-v-richardson-pa-1890.