Throop v. Woodford
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Upon review of the record and appellant’s response to the May 15, 2007 order to show cause, we hereby summarily affirm the district court’s order denying appellant’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief without prejudice prior to service of the complaint. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (summary affirmance appropriate where result is clear from face of record). All pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
234 F. App'x 535 (Throop v. Woodford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.