Throneburg v. Perdue

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 27, 2007·No. 06-2329·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-2329

ERIC SHANE THRONEBURG,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CHARLES R. PERDUE, JR.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Chief District Judge. (1:06-cv-00203)

Submitted: September 7, 2007 Decided: September 27, 2007

Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William J. Akers, AKERS LAW OFFICE, Princeton, West Virginia, for Appellant. Stuart A. McMillan, Diana Leigh Johnson, BOWLES, RICE, MCDAVID, GRAFF & LOVE, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Eric Shane Throneburg appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to Defendant and dismissing Throneburg’s

civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Throneburg v. Perdue, No. 1:06-cv-00203 (S.D. W.

Va. Nov. 9, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Throneburg v. Perdue, (4th Cir. 2007).

Throneburg v. Perdue (Throneburg v. Perdue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.