Throckmorton v. Burr

5 Cal. 400
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1855
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 5 Cal. 400 (Throckmorton v. Burr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Throckmorton v. Burr, 5 Cal. 400 (Cal. 1855).

Opinion

Heydenfeldt, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Murray, C. J., and Bryan, J., concurred.

From the character of the estate in common, tenants in common cannot join in an action for the. recovery of the estate. The interest [401]*401of each is separate and distinct. The subject of the action in such case, would be the whole estate, and it cannot be said that either of the parties is interested in the whole estate, but only in an undivided moiety. This is all that either one can recover, and. consequently all that he should be allowed to sue for.

This subject was examined to some extent by this Court in the case of Johnson v. Sepulbeda, 5 Cal., 149, and although it was unnecessary in that case to go as far as this case requires, yet the reasoning and authorities there relied on, fully sustain the view here taken.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jameson v. Chanslor-Canfield Midway Oil Co.
167 P. 363 (California Supreme Court, 1917)
Parke v. Kilham
8 Cal. 77 (California Supreme Court, 1857)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Cal. 400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/throckmorton-v-burr-cal-1855.