Thrivent Financial for Luthera v. Johanna Anderson

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
• Decided: February 4, 2013
• Docket: 11-35437
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION FEB 04 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

THRIVENT FINANCIAL FOR No. 11-35437 LUTHERANS, D.C. No. 1:10-cv-00156-RFC Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. MEMORANDUM *

LUCIA E. ANDRONESCU, FKA Lucia E. Anderson,

Defendant-cross-defendant - Appellee, v.

JOHANNA M. ANDERSON,

Defendant-cross-claimant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Richard F. Cebull, Chief District Judge, Presiding

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. Submitted June 5, 2012 ** Seattle, Washington

Before: SILVERMAN and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges, and HALL, District Judge.***

In a dispute over who is the proper beneficiary of Brent Anderson’s life

insurance policy, the district court granted judgment on the pleadings in favor of

Lucia Andronescu—Anderson’s ex-wife—because it found that Mont. Code Ann.

§ 72-2-814, which revokes, upon divorce, the designation of a spouse as a

beneficiary of a life insurance policy, did not apply retroactively.

We certified the question to the Montana Supreme Court and now reverse

because the Montana Supreme Court has ruled that Mont. Code. Ann. § 72-2-814

operates at the time of the insured’s death and revoked Andronescu’s status as a

beneficiary of Anderson’s policy. Thrivent Fin. for Lutherans v. Andronescu, 2013

MT 12, ___ P. 3d. ___, No. OP 12–0408, 2013 WL 227954 (Jan. 22, 2013).

REVERSED.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Janet C. Hall, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut, sitting by designation.