Thrift v. Plank

255 Cal. App. 2d 927, 63 Cal. Rptr. 161
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedOctober 18, 1967
DocketCiv. No. 665
StatusPublished

This text of 255 Cal. App. 2d 927 (Thrift v. Plank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thrift v. Plank, 255 Cal. App. 2d 927, 63 Cal. Rptr. 161 (Cal. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

STONE, J.

This is a companion case to Investors Thrift v. AMA Corp., ante, page 205 [63 Cal.Rptr. 157], Although the cases were tried separately, they have been presented jointly on appeal since the contentions in each ease are the same.

The same contract is presented to the court for interpretation in each case, and the questions of law are identical.

Upon the authority of and for the reasons stated in Investors Thrift v. AMA Corp., supra, the order from which this appeal was taken is affirmed.

Conley, P. J., and Gargano, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Investors Thrift v. AMA CORP.
255 Cal. App. 2d 205 (California Court of Appeal, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 Cal. App. 2d 927, 63 Cal. Rptr. 161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thrift-v-plank-calctapp-1967.