Threets v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Threets v. State

736 S.W.2d 282, 293 Ark. 205

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedSeptember 28, 1987

DocketCR 87-59

StatusPublished

This text of 736 S.W.2d 282 (Threets v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Threets v. State, 736 S.W.2d 282, 293 Ark. 205 (Ark. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

Arthur Lee Threets, Jr., was convicted of aggravated robbery, theft of property, and of being a felon in possession of a firearm. He had twelve prior felony convictions. The jury sentenced him to a total of 100 years imprisonment.

His only argument on appeal, that using the term habitual criminal before the jury denied him a fair trial, was not raised below. Therefore, we need not consider it. Wicks v. State, 270 Ark. 781, 606 S.W.2d 366 (1980).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

Arthur Lee Threets, Jr., was convicted of aggravated robbery, theft of property, and of being a felon in possession of a firearm. He had twelve prior felony convictions. The jury sentenced him to a total of 100 years imprisonment.

His only argument on appeal, that using the term habitual criminal before the jury denied him a fair trial, was not raised below. Therefore, we need not consider it. Wicks v. State, 270 Ark. 781, 606 S.W.2d 366 (1980).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

736 S.W.2d 282, 293 Ark. 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/threets-v-state-ark-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack