Threet v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Threet v. State

16 So. 2d 204, 31 Ala. App. 133, 1943 Ala. App. LEXIS 253

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 16, 1943

Docket8 Div. 254.

StatusPublished

This text of 16 So. 2d 204 (Threet v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Threet v. State, 16 So. 2d 204, 31 Ala. App. 133, 1943 Ala. App. LEXIS 253 (Ala. Ct. App. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

SIMPSON, Judge.

This case, as to the two controlling questions presented by the appeal, is in pari similibus with the cases of Lash v. State, ante, p. 121, 14 So.2d 235, and Threet v. State, post, p. 133, 16 So.2d 195, this day decided by this court.

In the said Lash and Threet cases, it was pointed out that an affirmance of the judgments of conviction, respectively, was due to be entered pursuant to an opinion delivered to this court by our Supreme Court. Code 1940, Title 13, Sec. 95.

Upon authority, therefore, of said cases (Lash and Threet), the judgment of the lower court in this case is ordered affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI