Threefoot v. New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad

43 So. 303, 89 Miss. 192
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1906
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 43 So. 303 (Threefoot v. New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Threefoot v. New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad, 43 So. 303, 89 Miss. 192 (Mich. 1906).

Opinion

Whitfield, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The learned judge correctly decided the case below. We only deem it necessary to say that a highly penal statute, like sec. 4301 of the code of 1892 (sec. 4853 of the code of 1906), is not complied with by a note in the following language:

“S. Gray, Agent: Oar pecans shipped us from Moran,- Texas, arrived yesterday and short forty-four bags. The original car [197]*197was transferred at some point, and presume that this is what caused the shortage. Kindly trace shortage, and oblige,
“Threeeoot Bros. & Co.”

It would be going far beyond any allowable limit in the construction of statutes imposing penalties to hold that the words “kindly trace shortage” are in any proper sense the equivalent for a demand for the notations, exceptions, etc., referred to in the section.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thompson v. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley R.
61 So. 825 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 So. 303, 89 Miss. 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/threefoot-v-new-orleans-northeastern-railroad-miss-1906.