Threadgill v. State

20 S.W.3d 412, 341 Ark. 892, 2000 Ark. LEXIS 370
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedJuly 13, 2000
DocketCR 00-758
StatusPublished

This text of 20 S.W.3d 412 (Threadgill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Threadgill v. State, 20 S.W.3d 412, 341 Ark. 892, 2000 Ark. LEXIS 370 (Ark. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Marcus Threadgill, by his attorney, IAM. Gray, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on her part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

A copy of this per curiam will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)
Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 S.W.3d 412, 341 Ark. 892, 2000 Ark. LEXIS 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/threadgill-v-state-ark-2000.