Threadgill v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Threadgill v. State

20 S.W.3d 412, 341 Ark. 892, 2000 Ark. LEXIS 370

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided July 13, 2000·No. CR 00-758·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Marcus Threadgill, by his attorney, IAM. Gray, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on her part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

A copy of this per curiam will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Marcus Threadgill, by his attorney, IAM. Gray, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on her part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

A copy of this per curiam will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

Threadgill v. State, 20 S.W.3d 412, 341 Ark. 892, 2000 Ark. LEXIS 370 (Ark. 2000).

Pincite

20 S.W.3d 412 (Threadgill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related