Threadgill v. City of Coalgate

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Threadgill v. City of Coalgate

1915 OK 662, 155 P. 241, 55 Okla. 681, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 215

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 21, 1915

Docket5121

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1915 OK 662 (Threadgill v. City of Coalgate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Threadgill v. City of Coalgate, 1915 OK 662, 155 P. 241, 55 Okla. 681, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 215 (Okla. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

WATTS, C.

This case comes from the district court of Coal county, where a demurrer was sustained to plaintiffs’ petition on March 31, 1913. Plaintiffs declined to plead further, judgment went for defendants on pleadings, and plaintiffs appeal, assigning: “The court erred in sustaining the demurrer of defendants to the petition.”

The certificate to the transcript of the record is not signed by the clerk of the court, neither is the seal thereof attached, and there is therefore nothing before us for decision.

“The Supreme Court will not review errors assigned upon the record in the absence of a certificate of the clerk *682 showing that the same is a full, true, and correct transcript of the record.” (Hughes v. Martin, 43 Okla. 710, 144 Pac. 356.)

We therefore recommend that the attempted appeal be dismissed. ' >

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI