Thrasher v. Stingone
This text of 602 So. 2d 965 (Thrasher v. Stingone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff below, Wilbert Thrasher, appeals from an adverse final summary judgment entered in favor of the defendants below, Dominick Stingone [Stingone] and Food Depot d/b/a Redland Holdings [966]*966[Food Depot]. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
The trial court erred in granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment where there are genuine issues of material fact. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); Weinberger v. City of West Miami, 578 So.2d 897 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Eagle Nat’l Bank of Miami v. Burks, 502 So.2d 69 (Fla.3d DCA 1987). Accordingly, the final summary judgment is reversed and this cause is remanded for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
602 So. 2d 965, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6847, 1992 WL 131867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thrasher-v-stingone-fladistctapp-1992.