Thrasher v. Miller

Supreme Court of Georgia

Thrasher v. Miller

89 S.E. 422, 145 Ga. 459, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 363

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJuly 11, 1916

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 89 S.E. 422 (Thrasher v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thrasher v. Miller, 89 S.E. 422, 145 Ga. 459, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 363 (Ga. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Evans, P. J.

There was no error in sustaining the plea of res adjudicata. The former suit, which was dismissed on general demurrer, was by the same plaintiff (with whom her agent was joined as coplaintiff) against the same defendant, and prayed for the cancellation of a deed to land executed by the plaintiff to the defendant, upon substantially the same grounds as alleged in the present action. Turner v. Cates, 90 Ga. 731 (2), 742 (16 S. E. 971).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Evans, P. J.

There was no error in sustaining the plea of res adjudicata. The former suit, which was dismissed on general demurrer, was by the same plaintiff (with whom her agent was joined as coplaintiff) against the same defendant, and prayed for the cancellation of a deed to land executed by the plaintiff to the defendant, upon substantially the same grounds as alleged in the present action. Turner v. Cates, 90 Ga. 731 (2), 742 (16 S. E. 971).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 S.E. 422, 145 Ga. 459, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thrasher-v-miller-ga-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack