Thrasher v. City of Atlanta

166 S.E. 856, 176 Ga. 71, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 387
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 13, 1932
DocketNo. 8924
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 166 S.E. 856 (Thrasher v. City of Atlanta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thrasher v. City of Atlanta, 166 S.E. 856, 176 Ga. 71, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 387 (Ga. 1932).

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

1. The court did not err in overruling the demurrer to the answers of the defendants.

2. Under the evidence in the case, the court did not err in refusing an interlocutory injunction.

[72]*72No. 8924. December 13, 1932. Charles W. Anderson, for plaintiff. J. L. Mayson, C. 8. Winn, J. C. Savage, Haas & Gambrell, Edgar Chambers Jr., Chadbourne Sianchfield & Levy, Louclcs & Cullen, and H. G. Holchlciss, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Russell, O. J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thrasher v. City of Atlanta
173 S.E. 817 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 S.E. 856, 176 Ga. 71, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thrasher-v-city-of-atlanta-ga-1932.