Thrasher v. City of Atlanta

Supreme Court of Georgia

Thrasher v. City of Atlanta

166 S.E. 856, 176 Ga. 71, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 387

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 13, 1932·No. No. 8924·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

1. The court did not err in overruling the demurrer to the answers of the defendants.

2. Under the evidence in the case, the court did not err in refusing an interlocutory injunction.

[72]*72No. 8924. December 13, 1932. Charles W. Anderson, for plaintiff. J. L. Mayson, C. 8. Winn, J. C. Savage, Haas & Gambrell, Edgar Chambers Jr., Chadbourne Sianchfield & Levy, Louclcs & Cullen, and H. G. Holchlciss, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Russell, O. J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beck, P. J.

1. The court did not err in overruling the demurrer to the answers of the defendants.

2. Under the evidence in the case, the court did not err in refusing an interlocutory injunction.

[72]*72No. 8924. December 13, 1932. Charles W. Anderson, for plaintiff. J. L. Mayson, C. 8. Winn, J. C. Savage, Haas & Gambrell, Edgar Chambers Jr., Chadbourne Sianchfield & Levy, Louclcs & Cullen, and H. G. Holchlciss, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Russell, O. J., disqualified.

Thrasher v. City of Atlanta, 166 S.E. 856, 176 Ga. 71, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 387 (Ga. 1932).

Pincite

166 S.E. 856 (Thrasher v. City of Atlanta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related