Thrasher 279825 v. Vannorstran

District Court, D. Arizona·Decided July 25, 2025·No. 4:24-cv-00050·Unknown

Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 8 Alex Guy Gillis Thrasher, ) 9 ) Plaintiff, ) 10 v. ) No. CIV 24-050-TUC-CKJ ) 11 Unknown VanNorstran, et al., ) ORDER ) 12 Defendants. ) ) 13 14 Pending before the Court is the Motion Requesting a Subpoena in a Civil Matter (Doc. 15 52) filed by Plaintiff Alex Guy Gillis Thrasher ("Thrasher"). Thrasher requests a subpoena 16 be issued to Facility Administrator Davey for production of the names and titles of 17 responsible parties/employees of Naphcare who are at issue in Thrasher's Counts 1, 2, 3, and 18 5. See e.g., Dyer v. Does 1-10, No. 23-CV-01226-JCS, 2024 WL 5711916, at *1 (N.D. Cal. 19 Dec. 10, 2024), citation omitted ("Courts in this Circuit permit expedited discovery to 20 identify unknown defendants . . ."). Additionally, Thrasher requests a copy of his Second 21 Amended Complaint accompany the subpoena so the Facility Administrator may correctly 22 identify the appropriate persons. 23 Thrasher's motion requests the issuance of a subpoena pursuant to the local general 24 order. The applicable general order states: 25 IT IS ORDERED that any self-represented litigant who wishes to serve a subpoena must file a motion with the Court for issuance of the subpoena. The motion must (1) 26 be in writing, (2) attach a copy of the proposed subpoena, (3) set forth the name and address of the witness to be subpoenaed and the custodian and general nature of any 27 documents requested, and (4) state with particularity the reasons for seeking the testimony and documents. The assigned judge shall determine whether the requested 28 subpoena shall issue. Issuance of the subpoena shall not preclude any witness or 1 person subpoenaed, or other interested party, from contesting the subpoena. 2 General Order 18-19. The issue before the Court is whether Thrasher has met the procedural 3 requirements of General Order 18-19 and does not address the admissibility/relevance of the 4 requested information. See Dennison v. Ryan, No. CV-18-04539-PHX-SPL, 2022 WL 5 2665926, at *3 (D. Ariz. July 11, 2022), citation omitted ("Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6 45(a)(3) states that '[t]he Clerk must issue a subpoena . . . to a party who requests it.' 7 Whether or not the requested items are relevant is germane to whether the subpoena should 8 be quashed, not whether it should be issued."); see also Gen. Order 18-19. 9 Thrasher has submitted a written motion, has set forth the name and address of the 10 witness to be subpoenaed and the general nature of the information requested, and the 11 reasons for seeking the information. However, "a subpoena duces tecum is a discovery tool 12 used for the production of documents or other tangible objects for inspection. Fed.R.Civ.P. 13 45(a)(2)(c). If plaintiff wishes to obtain specific information, he must seek that information 14 through other discovery methods, for example, interrogatories to a party[,]" Heilman v. 15 Lyons, No. 2:09-CV-2721 KJN P, 2010 WL 5168871, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2010), 16 emphasis added, or subpoena the production of documents which include the information 17 Thrasher seeks. The proposed subpoena, with a copy of the Second Amended Complaint 18 attached instead of an attachment specifically describing the persons sought to be identified, 19 places the burden on the recipient to not only draft a document, but also use discretion to 20 ascertain the information Thrasher seeks. 21 Further, Thrasher has only attached a copy of a partial proposed subpoena. The 22 proposed document only includes page one of the three page form (AO88B). While the 23 Court recognizes the U.S. Marshal1 may choose to use UMS-285 instead of page two of 24 25 1"Officers of the court are directed to serve all process on behalf of those proceeding in forma pauperis." Reed v. Barcklay, No. CV-11-01339-PHX-JAT, 2012 WL 2413074, at 26 *3 (D. Ariz. June 26, 2012), citing 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). Courts in this Circuit have 27 determined it is appropriate for the U.S. Marshal to serve a subpoena on behalf of a prisoner 28 1 || AO88B (the proof of service page), the general order does not indicate a partial submission 2 || of the subpoena is sufficient. 3 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED the Motion Requesting a Subpoena in a Civil Matter 4 || (Doc. 52) is DENIED WITH LEAVE TO RESUBMIT. 5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk of Court shall mail a blank AO88B form to 6 || Thrasher along with a copy of this Order. 7 DATED this 25th day of July, 2025. 9 Lanett, fC Qe: gerconet 10 United States Botnet Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 |} ——_——____—_—_- 74 || to assist in identifying a defendant. See e.g. Cramer v. Target Corp., 2010 WL 1849908 (E.D. Cal. May 6, 2010) (noting that a subpoena can facilitate identifying a defendant's 25 || current location so that a pro se prisoner can provide that information to the U.S. Marshal 6 || to effectuate service); Hamilton v. Hart, 2017 WL 85781, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2017) (noting an IFP plaintiff is entitled to service of a subpoena by a U.S. Marshal if the plaintiff 27 || provides the appropriate service address for the subpoena). 28 _3-

AO 88B (Rev. 02/14) Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of ) Plaintiff ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) ) Defendant ) SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS, INFORMATION, OR OBJECTS OR TO PERMIT INSPECTION OF PREMISES IN A CIVIL ACTION To: (Name of person to whom this subpoena is directed) O Production: YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce at the time, date, and place set forth below the following documents, electronically stored information, or objects, and to permit inspection, copying, testing, or sampling of the material:

Inspection of Premises: YOU ARE COMMANDED to permit entry onto the designated premises, land, or other property possessed or controlled by you at the time, date, and location set forth below, so that the requesting party may inspect, measure, survey, photograph, test, or sample the property or any designated object or operation on it.

The following provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 45 are attached — Rule 45(c), relating to the place of compliance; Rule 45(d), relating to your protection as a person subject to a subpoena; and Rule 45(e) and (g), relating to your duty to respond to this subpoena and the potential consequences of not doing so. Date: CLERK OF COURT OR Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk Attorney’s signature The name, address, e-mail address, and telephone number of the attorney representing (name of party) , who issues or requests this subpoena, are:

Notice to the person who issues or requests this subpoena If this subpoena commands the production of documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things or the inspection of premises before trial, a notice and a copy of the subpoena must be served on each party in this case before it is served on the person to whom it is directed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(4).

AO 88B (Rev. 02/14) Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action (Page 2) Civil Action No. PROOF OF SERVICE (This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 45.) received this subpoena for (name of individual and title, if any) on (date) .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thrasher 279825 v. Vannorstran, (D. Ariz. 2025).

Thrasher 279825 v. Vannorstran (Thrasher 279825 v. Vannorstran) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(d)