Thrash v. Apfel
This text of Thrash v. Apfel (Thrash v. Apfel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-31346 Summary Calendar
OLA M. THRASH, on behalf of Jerry K. Thrash Estate, on behalf of Dominique D. Gillham,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant-Appellee.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 5:99-CV-217 -------------------- July 14, 2000
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
On behalf of her foster daughter, Dominique D. Gillham, Ola
M. Thrash appeals from the district court’s order adopting the
magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and affirming the
Commissioner’s denial of Social Security benefits. Thrash argues
that the Commissioner’s decision was erroneous in light of the
enactment by the Louisiana State Legislature of special
legislation declaring Dominique the child of the Thrashes. We
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 99-31346 -2-
hold that the Commissioner applied the proper legal standards.
See 20 C.F.R. § 404.355(a)(1); United States v. Vernon Home
Health, Inc., 21 F.3d 693, 696 (5th Cir. 1994); Anthony v.
Sullivan, 954 F.2d 289, 292 (5th Cir. 1992); Smith v. Bowen, 862
F.2d 1165, 1166 (5th Cir. 1989).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Thrash v. Apfel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thrash-v-apfel-ca5-2000.