Thrall v. Pere Marquette Ry. Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Thrall v. Pere Marquette Ry. Co.

242 N.W. 233, 258 Mich. 355, 1932 Mich. LEXIS 1270

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedApril 12, 1932

DocketDocket No. 61, June Term, 1929, No. 65, January Term, 1931, Calendar Nos. 34,240, 35,209.

StatusPublished

This text of 242 N.W. 233 (Thrall v. Pere Marquette Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thrall v. Pere Marquette Ry. Co., 242 N.W. 233, 258 Mich. 355, 1932 Mich. LEXIS 1270 (Mich. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

By appeal plaintiff seeks retaxation of costs, awarded defendant for printing records and briefs on two appeals, claiming that such cost exceeds the customary and usual price of other mentioned printers. Defendant was not obliged to shop *Page 356 around to find the lowest bidder, but had a right to have the printing done by a reputable printer and tax the reasonable expense thereof. See Behr v. Baker, 257 Mich. 487.

The taxation by the clerk will stand affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By appeal plaintiff seeks retaxation of costs, awarded defendant for printing records and briefs on two appeals, claiming that such cost exceeds the customary and usual price of other mentioned printers. Defendant was not obliged to shop *Page 356 around to find the lowest bidder, but had a right to have the printing done by a reputable printer and tax the reasonable expense thereof. See Behr v. Baker, 257 Mich. 487.

The taxation by the clerk will stand affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 N.W. 233, 258 Mich. 355, 1932 Mich. LEXIS 1270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thrall-v-pere-marquette-ry-co-mich-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack