Thrall v. Pere Marquette Ry. Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Thrall v. Pere Marquette Ry. Co.

242 N.W. 233, 258 Mich. 355, 1932 Mich. LEXIS 1270

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided April 12, 1932·No. Docket No. 61, June Term, 1929, No. 65, January Term, 1931, Calendar Nos. 34,240, 35,209.·Published

Opinion

By appeal plaintiff seeks retaxation of costs, awarded defendant for printing records and briefs on two appeals, claiming that such cost exceeds the customary and usual price of other mentioned printers. Defendant was not obliged to shop *Page 356 around to find the lowest bidder, but had a right to have the printing done by a reputable printer and tax the reasonable expense thereof. See Behr v. Baker, 257 Mich. 487.

The taxation by the clerk will stand affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By appeal plaintiff seeks retaxation of costs, awarded defendant for printing records and briefs on two appeals, claiming that such cost exceeds the customary and usual price of other mentioned printers. Defendant was not obliged to shop *Page 356 around to find the lowest bidder, but had a right to have the printing done by a reputable printer and tax the reasonable expense thereof. See Behr v. Baker, 257 Mich. 487.

The taxation by the clerk will stand affirmed.

Thrall v. Pere Marquette Ry. Co., 242 N.W. 233, 258 Mich. 355, 1932 Mich. LEXIS 1270 (Mich. 1932).

Pincite

242 N.W. 233 (Thrall v. Pere Marquette Ry. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related