Thrall v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.
258 Mich. 355
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thrall v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 257 Mich. 269 →
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided April 12, 1932·No. Docket No. 61, No. 65, Calendar Nos. 34,240, 35,209·Published
Opinion
Retaxation oe Costs.
By appeal plaintiff seeks retaxation of costs, awarded defendant for printing records and briefs on two appeals, claiming that such cost exceeds the customary and usual price of other mentioned printers. Defendant was not obliged to shop [356]*356around to find the lowest bidder, but had a right to have the printing done by a reputable printer and tax the reasonable expense thereof. See Behr v. Baker, 257 Mich. 487.
The taxation by the clerk will stand affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thrall v. Pere Marquette Railway Co., 258 Mich. 355 (Mich. 1932).
258 Mich. 355 (Thrall v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Behr v. Baker
241 N.W. 229 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1931)