Thos. Cook & Son, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Thos. Cook & Son, Inc. v. United States

34 Cust. Ct. 288

United States Customs Court·Decided February 17, 1955·No. No. 58784; protest 236349-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

When the case was called for trial, counsel for the Government moved to dismiss the protest on the ground that it was untimely. A representative of the plaintiff stated that the firm did not find out until 7 months after entry that the goods were of American manufacture. It appearing from the official papers that the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely. (Section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

When the case was called for trial, counsel for the Government moved to dismiss the protest on the ground that it was untimely. A representative of the plaintiff stated that the firm did not find out until 7 months after entry that the goods were of American manufacture. It appearing from the official papers that the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely. (Section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.)

Thos. Cook & Son, Inc. v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 288 (cusc 1955).

Pincite

34 Cust. Ct. 288 (Thos. Cook & Son, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.