Thorson v. State
This text of 2014 ND 213 (Thorson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 12/18/14 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2014 ND 213
David L. Thorson, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20140144
Appeal from the District Court of Morton County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Sonna M. Anderson, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Robert Wade Martin, North Dakota Public Defenders’ Office, 11 1st Avenue SW, Minot, ND 58701, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.
Brian David Grosinger, Assistant State’s Attorney, 210 2nd Avenue NW, Mandan, ND 58554, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.
Thorson v. State
[¶1] David L. Thorson appeals from a district court order denying his application for postconviction relief. Thorson argues the district court erred in finding representation of his attorneys at trial and at his first postconviction relief proceeding, respectively, did not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel because counsel failed to call a witness at trial and, subsequently, counsel failed to argue the failure to do so at the first postconviction relief proceeding. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), concluding the district court’s findings of facts are not clearly erroneous.
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V. Sandstrom
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2014 ND 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thorson-v-state-nd-2014.