Thorpe v. State

453 So. 2d 487, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14331
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 27, 1984·No. No. 84-256·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no merit in appellant’s contention that the trial court lacked jurisdiction over this matter, and thus we affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence for concealing a child contrary to court order, a violation of section 787.04, Florida Statutes (1988). We agree with appellant’s assertion, however, that the trial court improperly imposed court costs and attorney’s fees against appellant for his defense by the public defender.

Section 27.56(1), Florida Statutes (1983), authorizes assessment of the challenged costs and fees against an indigent defendant after compliance with the notice and hearing requirements specified in section 27.56(7). Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947, 950 (Fla.1984); Shaffer v. State, 446 So.2d 1156, 1157 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Anderson v. State, 415 So.2d 49, 50 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). See also Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.720(d)(1). Our review of the record discloses that the trial court ordered payment of these costs without affording appellant adequate notice and an opportunity to object to the court’s determination. Accordingly, we vacate that portion of the final judgment imposing these assessments and remand for proper consideration of this matter. We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence in a11 other respects.

RYDER, C.J., and HOBSON and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thorpe v. State, 453 So. 2d 487, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14331 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

453 So. 2d 487 (Thorpe v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jenkins v. State
444 So. 2d 947 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Anderson v. State
415 So. 2d 49 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Shaffer v. State
446 So. 2d 1156 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)