Thorpe v. Padgett

920 So. 2d 721, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1615, 2006 WL 297652
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 9, 2006·No. No. 1D05-5978·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of December [722]*72220, 2005, the Court has determined that the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Cf. Ashley v. Moore, 742 So.2d 533 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Dominguez v. Barakat, 609 So.2d 664 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1992). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

WEBSTER, POLSTON and HAWKES, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thorpe v. Padgett, 920 So. 2d 721, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1615, 2006 WL 297652 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

920 So. 2d 721 (Thorpe v. Padgett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ashley v. Moore
742 So. 2d 533 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Dominguez v. Barakat
609 So. 2d 664 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)