Thorpe v. Goord

43 A.D.3d 1258, 841 N.Y.S.2d 808
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 27, 2007·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of unauthorized organizational activity. On administrative appeal, that determination was affirmed with a modified penalty. Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination of guilt. The Attorney General has advised that, during the pendency of this proceeding, the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the surcharge imposed has been refunded to petitioner. Given that petitioner has been afforded all of the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is now dismissed as moot (see Matter of Lewis v Goord, 37 AD3d 917, 917 [2007]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thorpe v. Goord, 43 A.D.3d 1258, 841 N.Y.S.2d 808 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

43 A.D.3d 1258 (Thorpe v. Goord) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Covington v. Smith
72 A.D.3d 1370 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Deal v. Rivera
56 A.D.2d 834 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Hale v. Maly
51 A.D.3d 1232 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Rondon v. Selsky
49 A.D.3d 990 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)