Thorpe v. Commissioner

1983 T.C. Memo. 150, 45 T.C.M. 1045, 1983 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 631
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedMarch 22, 1983
DocketDocket No. 18327-80
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1983 T.C. Memo. 150 (Thorpe v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thorpe v. Commissioner, 1983 T.C. Memo. 150, 45 T.C.M. 1045, 1983 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 631 (tax 1983).

Opinion

RONALD T. THORPE, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Thorpe v. Commissioner
Docket No. 18327-80
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1983-150; 1983 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 631; 45 T.C.M. (CCH) 1045; T.C.M. (RIA) 83150;
March 22, 1983.
Ronald T. Thorpe, pro se.
Steven K. Dick, for the respondent.

WILBUR

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WILBUR, Judge: This matter is before the Court on respondent's motion for summary judgment filed on November 2, 1982. The motion was heard at the Indianapolis trial session on January 24, 1983.

In his statutory notice of deficiency dated July 3, 1980 respondent*632 determined the following deficiencies in petitioner's Federal income tax and additions to tax:

Addition to Tax
YearDeficiencySec. 6653(b) 1
1976$2,108$1,054.00
19772,3171,158.50
Totals$4,425$2,212.50

Petitioner filed a timely petition invoking the jurisdiction of this Court. The petition does not raise any genuine issue of material fact relating to petitioner's Federal income tax liability. The facts contained in the petition are as follows:

(a) Petitioner did not have any "gain" for any of the years at issue;

(b) Petitioner's activities were all on an equal exchange basis during each of the years at issue;

(c) On oath and affirmation, and under penalties of perjury petitioner declares he had no gain whatsoever in 1976 or 1977.

In his answer to the petition, respondent alleged facts designed to show that a part of the 1976 and 1977 underpayments were due to fraud within the meaning of section 6653(b). Petitioner's reply generally denied the allegations of respondent's answer, but*633 alleged no new facts to support that denial. On July 27, 1981 respondent filed a request for admissions pursuant to Rule 90; 2 that request set forth facts designed to show that part of petitioner's underpayments were due to fraud. On August 21, 1981 petitioner filed a "response to request," alleging that respondent's request was moot until jurisdiction was established under section 556(d) of Title 5 U.S.C., Administrative Procedures Act. No other response to the request for admissions was received within 30 days of service of the request, and under Rule 90(c) the alleged facts are deemed admitted. On November 2, 1982 respondent filed a motion for summary judgment asking that the Court hold that respondent is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

All of the arguments raised by the petition and subsequent motions are without merit. Wages are subject to the Federal income tax under the clear language of section 61(a)(1). Eisner v. Macomber,252 U.S. 189 (1920); Rice v. Commissioner,T.C. Memo. 1982-129 and cases cited therein. Petitioner contends the*634 value of his services was equal to the compensation received and therefore he had no "gain" subject to tax. Petitioner's argument, if valid, would mean that only those who were overcompensated for their services would have personal service income, and this is plainly inconsistent with the provisions of section 61(a)(1) (including in income "compensation for services, including fees, commissions, and similar items"). Accordingly, petitioner is liable as a matter of law for the deficiencies in tax.

Respondent has the burden of proving that at least some of petitioner's underpayment of tax in 1976 and 1977 was due to fraud with intent to evade tax. Sections 7454(a); 6653(b); Rule 142(b). Respondent must prove fraud by clear and convincing evidence, showing that the petitioner acted with the specific intent to evade a tax believed to be owing. Cefalu v. Commissioner,276 F.2d 122, 128 (5th Cir. 1960), affg. T.C. Memo. 1958-37.

The facts deemed admitted under Rule 90(c) show that petitioner was employed by the United States Postal Service in his home town of Elkhart, Indiana. In 1976 he earned $13,658.11 in salary, and some $323.89 was withheld for*635 Federal income taxes. On Forms W-4 filed during that year petitioner claimed 99 exemptions. In 1977 petitioner earned $14,568.33 in his job at the Postal Service. He filed a W-4E claiming exemption from income tax withholding; no income tax was withheld. Petitioner filed a document purporting to be an individual income tax return for 1976, but this did not constitute a legal return. Reiff v.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eisner v. MacOmber
252 U.S. 189 (Supreme Court, 1920)
Morris v. Commissioner
30 T.C. 928 (U.S. Tax Court, 1958)
Gilday v. Commissioner
62 T.C. No. 30 (U.S. Tax Court, 1974)
Reiff v. Commissioner
77 T.C. 1169 (U.S. Tax Court, 1981)
Jarvis v. Commissioner
78 T.C. No. 45 (U.S. Tax Court, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1983 T.C. Memo. 150, 45 T.C.M. 1045, 1983 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thorpe-v-commissioner-tax-1983.