Thorp v. Steadman

140 So. 432, 224 Ala. 290, 1932 Ala. LEXIS 559
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided March 10, 1932·No. 8 Div. 364.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is prosecuted from what purports to be an order or decree of the probate court and which appears on page 5 of the record. Said decree amounts to nothing more than a holding that a certain plea of the defendant was sustained. There is nothing to indicate a final disposition of the cause, and it is not such a final decree that will support an appeal under section 6078 of the Code of 1923. Nor is it of the character of inter-’ loeutory judgments or decrees as will authorize an appeal therefrom as provided by other provisions of the statute.

The appeal is dismissed.

ANDERSON, O. J., and GARDNER, BOUL-DIN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thorp v. Steadman, 140 So. 432, 224 Ala. 290, 1932 Ala. LEXIS 559 (Ala. 1932).

140 So. 432 (Thorp v. Steadman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jackson Lumber Co. v. W. T. Smith Lumber Co.
25 So. 2d 853 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1946)