Thorp v. Lorenz
25 N.W. 712, 34 Minn. 350, 1885 Minn. LEXIS 244
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order made on the trial dismissing the action, on the ground that the complaint did not state a cause of action. It has been repeatedly held by this court that an order of this kind is not appealable. Rogers v. Holyoke, 14 Minn. 387, (514;) Lamb v. McCanna, 14 Minn. 385, (513;) Searles v. Thompson, 18 Minn. 285, (316.) The plaintiff should either have moved for a new trial and appealed from the order refusing it, or else caused judgment of dismissal to have been entered, and then appealed from the judgment.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thorp v. Lorenz, 25 N.W. 712, 34 Minn. 350, 1885 Minn. LEXIS 244 (Mich. 1885).
25 N.W. 712 (Thorp v. Lorenz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Beatty v. Winona Housing & Redevelopment Authority
151 N.W.2d 584 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1967)
Royal Realty Co. v. Levin
66 N.W.2d 5 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1954)
H. Christiansen & Sons, Inc. v. City of Duluth
31 N.W.2d 277 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1948)
In Re Estate of Firle
253 N.W. 889 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1934)
Long v. Mutual Trust Life Insurance
253 N.W. 762 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1934)
Lundblad v. Erickson
230 N.W. 473 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1930)
Wall v. First National Bank of Crosby
193 N.W. 51 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1923)
Van Vlissingen v. Oliver
113 N.W. 383 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1907)
Kennedy v. Citizens' National Bank
93 N.W. 71 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1903)
Hine v. Myrick
62 N.W. 1125 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1895)
In re Weber
28 L.R.A. 621 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1894)
Johnson v. Northern Pacific, Fergus Falls & Black Hills Railway Co.
38 N.W. 804 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1888)