Thorp v. General News Bureau, Inc.

242 A.D. 330, 275 N.Y.S. 41, 1934 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6060
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 9, 1934
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 242 A.D. 330 (Thorp v. General News Bureau, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thorp v. General News Bureau, Inc., 242 A.D. 330, 275 N.Y.S. 41, 1934 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6060 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The corporate defendant is engaged in the business of gathering and distributing racing news. Its business is in no way clothed with a public interest. It, therefore, has a right to refuse to do business with plaintiffs (Locker v. American Tobacco Co., 121 App. Div. 443; affd., 195 N. Y. 565; Moore v. N. Y. Cotton Exchange, 296 Fed. 61; Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Cream of Wheat Co., 227 id. 46), so long as it is guilty of no tortious act affecting them in denying such service. It may not be required, therefore, to furnish its service to the plaintiffs with whom it has no contractual obligations.

As on the argument it appeared that plaintiffs had discontinued broadcasting defendants’ news, the order in so far as it denied the corporate defendant’s cross-motion should be affirmed, without prejudice to a renewal of the motion to enjoin plaintiffs in the [331]*331event that plaintiffs resume the broadcasting complained against. The order appealed from, in so far as it grants plaintiffs’ motion to restrain defendants from discontinuing the news service furnished plaintiffs by defendant General News Bureau, Inc., should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and said motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Present — Finch, P. J., Martin, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Order, in so far as it grants plaintiffs’ motion to restrain defendants from discontinuing the news service furnished plaintiffs by defendant General News Bureau, Inc., reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gilloley v. Sampson
281 N.W. 3 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
242 A.D. 330, 275 N.Y.S. 41, 1934 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6060, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thorp-v-general-news-bureau-inc-nyappdiv-1934.