Thornton v. Winpenny

10 Misc. 791
CourtCity of New York Municipal Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1894
StatusPublished

This text of 10 Misc. 791 (Thornton v. Winpenny) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thornton v. Winpenny, 10 Misc. 791 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The amended exception to the decision of the referee brings up but one question for review.

The referee decided that the plaintiff, at the special instance and request of defendant, between the 1st day of May and the 15th of June, 1893, rendered services to the defendant in selling goods, wares and merchandise for him.

To this decision the defendant excepted as against the weight of evidence.

We think there was sufficient evidence in the case to warrant the conclusion of the referee, and the judgment should, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.

Present: Yaw Wyck, Oowlaw and Fitzsimows, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Misc. 791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thornton-v-winpenny-nynyccityct-1894.