Thornton v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Thornton v. United States

432 F. App'x 226

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 25, 2011·No. No. 11-6069·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Randy L. Thornton, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2010) petition and has moved for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Thornton’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Thornton v. United States, No. 5:10-hc-02023-D (E.D.N.C. Jan. 6, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Randy L. Thornton, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2010) petition and has moved for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Thornton’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Thornton v. United States, No. 5:10-hc-02023-D (E.D.N.C. Jan. 6, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Thornton v. United States, 432 F. App'x 226 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

432 F. App'x 226 (Thornton v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related