Thornton v. State

525 S.W.3d 220, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 874, 2017 WL 3860292
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 5, 2017
DocketNo. ED 105106
StatusPublished

This text of 525 S.W.3d 220 (Thornton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thornton v. State, 525 S.W.3d 220, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 874, 2017 WL 3860292 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Joseph Thornton appeals the denial of his Rule 24,035 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no prec-edential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order; We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2)&(5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
525 S.W.3d 220, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 874, 2017 WL 3860292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thornton-v-state-moctapp-2017.