Thornton v. Petersen

California Supreme Court

Thornton v. Petersen

26 P. 1091, 3 Cal. Unrep. 415

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJune 22, 1891

DocketNo. 13,195

StatusPublished

This text of 26 P. 1091 (Thornton v. Petersen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thornton v. Petersen, 26 P. 1091, 3 Cal. Unrep. 415 (Cal. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

TEMPLE, C.

This appeal is from the judgment, and from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. The only alleged errors are specifications under the claim that the evi[416]*416dence was insufficient to justify the decision. We have carefully examined the record, and are satisfied that there is abundant evidence to sustain all the findings. It is really an attempt to have this court weigh the evidence, and decide the case according to the preponderance. The appeal ought not to have been taken. The judgment and order should be affirmed.

We concur: Belcher, C. C.; Foote, C.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion the judgment and order are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TEMPLE, C.

This appeal is from the judgment, and from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. The only alleged errors are specifications under the claim that the evi[416]*416dence was insufficient to justify the decision. We have carefully examined the record, and are satisfied that there is abundant evidence to sustain all the findings. It is really an attempt to have this court weigh the evidence, and decide the case according to the preponderance. The appeal ought not to have been taken. The judgment and order should be affirmed.

We concur: Belcher, C. C.; Foote, C.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion the judgment and order are affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 P. 1091, 3 Cal. Unrep. 415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thornton-v-petersen-cal-1891.