Thornton v. Mundy

140 S.E. 920, 37 Ga. App. 476, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 349
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 13, 1927
Docket18473
StatusPublished

This text of 140 S.E. 920 (Thornton v. Mundy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thornton v. Mundy, 140 S.E. 920, 37 Ga. App. 476, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 349 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. None of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial show cause for a reversal of the judgment below.

2. Under all the facts of the case'as disálosed by the record, this court [477]*477can not hold that there was no evidence authorizing the verdict, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial court, and no reversible error of law appearing, this court is without authority to interfere. Judgment affirmed.

Decided December 13, 1927. J. J. Barge, for plaintiff in error. W. M. Wright, contra. Luloe and BloodwortTi, JJ., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 S.E. 920, 37 Ga. App. 476, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thornton-v-mundy-gactapp-1927.