Thornton v. . Motor Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Thornton v. . Motor Co.

124 S.E. 927, 188 N.C. 816, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 191

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 24, 1924·Published

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

A careful perusal of tbe record leaves us with the impression that the case has been tried substantially in compliance with the law bearing on the subject; and we have found no action or ruling on the part of the trial court which we apprehend should be held for reversible error.

The chief contention of the defendants is that there is a variance between the cause of action alleged and the one established by the proof, but we do not so construe the evidence and the pleadings.

The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam.

A careful perusal of tbe record leaves us with the impression that the case has been tried substantially in compliance with the law bearing on the subject; and we have found no action or ruling on the part of the trial court which we apprehend should be held for reversible error.

The chief contention of the defendants is that there is a variance between the cause of action alleged and the one established by the proof, but we do not so construe the evidence and the pleadings.

The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Thornton v. . Motor Co., 124 S.E. 927, 188 N.C. 816, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 191 (N.C. 1924).

Pincite

124 S.E. 927 (Thornton v. . Motor Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.